Why might someone seek revenge? Du To understand his Idea I began to break down the quote. Is revenge ever justified?
Immediately appealing to a sense of moral superiority, Bacon points out Du The people who live the lives of negative, vengeful people will have to suffer the consequences of their way of living. Therefore why should I be angry with a man, for Revenge essay bacon himself better than me? If someone was to kill a member of your family, are you entitled to killing an equal valued family member of theirs?
Some, when they take revenge, are desirous, the party should know, Revenge essay bacon it cometh. But base and crafty cowards, are like the arrow that flieth in the dark. Bacon continues to appeal to common sense in his argument that no man seeks to do harm for its own sake we can argue that one and that getting mad at someone for trying to better himself is not a worthwhile exercise.
Stephen Holliday Certified Educator "On Revenge" is a typical, highly logical Bacon argument against private revenge and acknowledges that "public revenges are for the most part fortunate.
The first wrong Is governed by the law Revenge essay bacon the act of revenge is outside the law. If, Bacon argues, one engages in revenge that has no lawful remedy, then that revenge might be tolerable, but he warns that the person seeking revenge should make sure there is no law that will punish him.
Public revenges are for the most part fortunate; as that for the death of Caesar; for the death of Pertinax; for the death of Henry the Third of France; and many more. If another person made them feel powerless, foolish, ridiculous, stupid, or ashamed people might try seeking revenge against them.
He views revenge as a perversion of the law. So we come back to the same questions. The Bible, Exodus Usually people feel they have been attacked in some way or suffered an unjust loss or injury.
Other mimes they may feel they have to defend their honor whether it is for themselves, their family, their ancestors, or another group they identify themselves with.
He claims that whenever a an Is focused on revenge, [It] keeps his own wounds green. So why do people do it? He lists the Just deaths of a few old world leaders while appealing to a higher morality by believing that private revenge is Just as bad.
And if any man should do wrong, merely out of ill-nature, why, yet it is but like the thorn or briar, which prick and scratch, because they can do no other. It seems that the concept of revenge has been In the minds of people since the beginning of time.
While this is great evidence in helping me understand vengeance this still does not explain why people seek revenge. Sir Francis Bacon was an English philosopher, statesman, scientist, jurist, orator and author. This is certain, that a man that studieth revenge, keeps his own wounds green, which otherwise would heal, and do well.
And, in an attempt to add common sense to the mix of reasons, Bacon points out that wise men have enough to do with the present and the future. Is an eye for an eye what is best? He states that ignoring a wrong makes a man superior to the person who committed the first wrong US.
Just cause you are emotionally distraught, does that enable you to seek revenge without punishment to yourself? They are feeling anger, hate, Jealousy, envy, and or shame towards the situation.
For as for the first wrong, it doth but offend the law; but the revenge of that wrong, putteth the law out of office. After I was able to finish reading Of Revenge I decided that I should summarize his story to get a better understanding of his views on revenge.
After reading I began to ask myself some questions. Revenge always happens to be a very interesting topic, typically filled with drama or action.
Sometimes people are simply humiliated. Francis Bacon in his short story Of Revenge discusses that revenge is usually something that never produces a good outcome and is typically only viewed as Just if it publicly deserved.
I began my research on Google. That which is past is gone, and irrevocable; and wise men have enough to do, with things present and to come; therefore they do but trifle with themselves, that labor in past matters. Since a wrong in the past cannot be made right, it is best to concentrate on the present and future academia.
This is the more generous. But yet the spirit of Job was in a better tune:Of Revenge. Francis Bacon. Essays, Civil and Moral.
For as for the first wrong, it doth but offend the law; but the revenge of that wrong putteth the law out of office. Certainly, in taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy; but in passing it over, he is superior; for it is a prince’s part to pardon.
In this essay, Bacon questions whether revenge is legally or morally defensible. Instead he presents a humanist view more in line with the Christian ideal of turning the other cheek (Matthew 5. 39–41) or leaving vengeance in the hands of God (‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay saith the Lord’, Romans 19).
"On Revenge" () is a typical, highly logical Bacon argument against private revenge and acknowledges that "public revenges are for the most part fortunate." The language is direct and free of. The complete text of Essays of Francis Bacon. Civil and Moral, of Francis Ld. Verulam Viscount St.
Albans. Presented by Auth o rama Public Domain Books. Francis Bacon () Of Revenge. REVENGE is a kind of wild justice; which the more man’ s nature runs to, the more ought law to weed it out. For as for the first wrong, it doth but. The Essays of Francis Bacon Author: Francis Bacon, Mary Augusta Scott Created Date: 9/10/ PM.
A notable jurist who served as both attorney general and Lord Chancellor of England, Bacon argues in his essay "Of Revenge" () that the "wild justice" of personal revenge is a fundamental challenge to the rule of law.Download